Archive for the 'Programming' Category



Learning to Code in Ruby on Rails

Monday 3 August 2009 @ 10:32 pm

Ruby on rails is largely gaining grounds around web development world, because of its ‘instant-web development’ concept. In absolute synergy with times, the ROR developers were consistently gaining additional edge over other developers, given the optimal utilization of its single, yet mostly effective speedy web development strategy. The embrace of this winning feature leads to a Win-Win situation for the clients and the company alike.

Ruby on Rail is a free web application framework, which intends to increase the speed and straightforwardness with which database-driven web sites could be made and offers skeleton code frameworks from the outset. Often shortened to Rails, or ROR, Ruby On Rails is an project written around Ruby programming language and applications using the Rails framework are created using the Rails framework are created using the Model-Sight-Controller Design Pattern.

Rails is a full-stack framework for developing database-backed web applications in accordance with the Model-Sight-Control pattern. From the Ajax around sight, to the request and response around controller, to the domain model wrapping the database, Rails gives you a pure-Ruby development habitat. To go live, all you have to add is a database and a web server.

The fundamental Ruby on Rails principles includes Convention over Configuration , CoC, and Do not repeat yourself , DRY.

“Do not repeat yourself” means that advice is found in a single unambiguous place For instance, using Active Record, the developer doesn’t have to specify database column names in class definitions. Instead, Ruby can retrieve this advice from the database.

“Convention over Configuration” means a developer only needs to specify unconventional aspects of the application. For instance, if there is a class Sale around model, the corresponding table around database is called sales by default. It’s only if one deviates from this convention, like calling the table “products sold” that one needs to write code regarding these names.

Recently, the Ruby on Rails team agreed to a partnership with the Merb team which will be called “Rails 3″. Hopefully it will take the best aspects of both frameworks and combine them into one mega-framework.

Due to these strict defaults, Rails is often referred to as “opinionated software”, which has been a point of contention for many critics of Rails. In spite of how recent ruby on rails is to the programming world, many persons are jumping on board and beginning to use it to develop large, database intense programs and web apps, and they’re having a lot of success in doing so. So test out Ruby on Rails today.

Learn how to program in Ruby on Rails today.

[tags]programming, ror, ruby, ruby on rails, computer[/tags]




Understanding Software Inspection

Tuesday 23 June 2009 @ 1:42 pm

Software inspection is one of the most common sorts of review practices to be found in most software projects. The main focus or goal involved in any inspection is for the team to reach a majority agreement on a new or improved work product and then go on to approve it for use in the general project.

Most software inspections include 2 major processes known as software requirement specifications and the test plans. An inspection involves a work product being carefully selected for a review and then a team of developers are gathered for an inspections feedback meeting to review the software in question.

A chair is chosen to preside and moderate the meeting to ensure the smooth running of the meeting as software inspections are known for the time they take to complete. Each software inspector prepares for the inspection by carefully reading the work product and then formatting constructive feedback for the team making a note of any defects they have found.

This is the main purpose of any planned inspection, to identify and rectify any defects within the work product. A defect is defined as any part of the work product that would prevent a potential inspector from approving it. If the product was being inspected for software requirements specification then a defect would be any part of the text which an inspector believes is a defect of disagrees with, these defects are then discussed collectively within the meeting.

The first structured software inspection process was developed my Michael Fagan in the mid - 1970s and it has later been extended and modified, to meet the needs of a more modern inspection process. Any inspection process should have an entry criteria, this will determine if and when the inspection process is ready to begin, this is vital for preventing unfinished or inadequate work products from entering the inspection process. The entry criteria usually consist of a checklist which includes item such as - the document has been spell checked.

There are 6 main areas to any competent inspections process and usually consist of planning, preparation, inspection meeting, rework and follow-up. There is a certain degree of flexibility in this approach but sticking to the guidelines where possible will ensure a smooth and efficient software review process. If you are part of a software inspection team it is important you fully understand the work product in question and make accurate notes about any defects involved.

If you would like to learn more about Software Inspection please visit our Code Review Site

[tags]code review, software inspection[/tags]




Why Isn’t Everyone Making Use of Software Inspections?

Tuesday 23 June 2009 @ 1:23 pm

Software inspections are able to provide significant benefits to any project, but yet the adoption of the inspection process has been very slow. Surely understanding the benefits of the inspection process any developer would want to be making use of the method, yet it seems not.

Data was published over 2 decades ago that prove the absolute effectiveness of the software inspection process and the most recent reports seem to back up this data, so why is it inspections have not cemented their place in code review and been involved in much wider use?

There is a common misconception that software inspections can only be done one way and lack any real diversity. Another aspect that stops developers undertaking the inspection process is the fact that many believe it is not easy to do well. There are many factors including both social and psychological that goes into the mix to create a fear towards the inspection process. Management very often see software inspection as an added cost, when in actual fact inspections help to reduce costs during a work product process. There is much evidence available to suggest that inspections are very cost efficient and do more to enhance a campaign in comparison to a normal review.

Ever since inspections came into play they have diminished in popularity due to the advent of new development tools or languages, this causes both the providers and users to question the value inspections carry, some even believing they have become less necessary. One question that needs to be asked is, how can this be true when programmers are still making defects and errors regardless of the new tools and languages? The problem is there is little written evidence to suggest inspections work in these new and changing times, so choosing to opt out of implementing software inspections must simply be based on myth.

Taking all the above factors into account it is easy to see why corners are being cut in the software inspection process without any real evidence to suggest these shortcuts are in fact improvements. Some of these new and evolving changes have caused the inspection process to become less and less effective. Inspections are definitely no the most exciting aspect of engineering in comparison to design and programming, however they still offer massive value. They may be low tech and need intensive laboring but the fact is they still work.

If you would like to learn more about Software Inspection please visit our Code Review Site

[tags]code review, software inspection[/tags]




Some Peer Code Review Challenges

Tuesday 23 June 2009 @ 1:11 pm

Peer code review or as it is often referred to as simply code review, is an in depth line by line walkthrough or review of a code module. Each segment of the code is inspected to highlight faults and look for areas of improvement which ensures business needs are met. Usually after peer code review has been performed there will be a meeting between team members to discuss the findings and suggestions on improvements in the code.

A lot of programmers would argue quite aggressively that reviews are far too time consuming, however it is well noted that the drawbacks almost always out weight the benefits received from well planned peer reviews. The benefits are many and they include, fewer bugs, less rework, more pride and all round better team communication.

Code review methodologies come in various shapes and sizes and each company that writes code for a living tend to have their own custom process, however there are some common elements to most review processes. The three step model is very common and includes preparation, review and follow ups. A well thought out review process will need to include all three of these vital elements.

Even the most efficient review process can come across challenges the most common ones will include time, preparation, initial frustration and the need to show commitment.

Peer reviews are known for the enormous amount of time they take up. Like any other meeting a strong focus on the topic, being familiar with the process and establishing solid rules and principles can help keep the time down to a reasonable level.

Dealing with team members who are not familiar with the code review process can be a highly frustrating element. A review team need to devise a structure that suits all and only deviate from it in exceptional circumstances. Do this and over time all members will come a custom to the process and the review will run smoothly.

Random peer reviews do offer some benefit but also raises a large question over commitment. You should really be looking to implement the reviews for every module, and sticking to a consistent program. Preparation is key to any successful code review process and sometimes the reading of unfamiliar documentation takes time and distracts from the coding process, however this is sometimes necessary and the benefits will be reaped at a later date as the team grows and learns to carry out the review more efficiently.

If you would like to learn more about Code Review please visit our Software Inspection Site

[tags]code review, software inspection[/tags]




Disadvantages of Code Review Walk-Through

Tuesday 23 June 2009 @ 1:01 pm

The most common kind of code review is the ever common wal-through review. It can be over the shoulder review or a more formal process involving meetings, either way the walk-through review involves the author highlighting his changes and attempting to gain feedback from other members of the team.

Even though this is a popular type of review I really feel there are some major disadvantages which in my mind hinder the effectiveness of the process.

A fundamental can become apparent when the next developer has to understand or even maintain the code. He will not have the advantage of the author walking him through it and important information is often left out of the code due to the reviewer’s acceptance of what made sense when the review was written.

Walk through reviews tend to be rather shallow with little time allowed to look for the more subtle problems within the code. A bug will be fixed when it is spotted in the walk-through, but what other code depends on it? Will it cause any behavioral issues within the code? These questions can be best answered in a lone review.

There is real lack of diversity in any code walk-through with the author driving the process and others simply clarifying what has been said matches what has been done. This also creates a lack of depth as it turns into a very basic confirmation process.

Meetings can be extremely time consuming and can be hard to manage when participants are separated by many time zones. It also very easy to become sidetracked in these meetings even though a good moderator can mitigate this problem.

Despite the above down sides to walk through reviews, they do have their advantages. Because the process is carried out in a team, it is an excellent environment for new developers to learn and to pass new ideas between each other. There are also many instructive conversations that have the benefit of happening in person which you do not get in a lone review.

It’s also nice to have multiple skills present in the room as this provides wider learning as well as the review benefiting from multiple expertise. So to round up I would always recommend doing a lone code review as the default mode but do not forget to communicate and never turn down the walk-through option, especially if there is a member who could benefit from the experience.

If you would like to learn more about Code Review please visit our Software Inspection Site

[tags]code review, software inspection[/tags]




Making Code Review Less Painful For Developers

Tuesday 23 June 2009 @ 12:42 pm

If you’re a developer who is having to undergo the painful process of having your code reviewed there are many things you can do to enhance the experience and make it flow with much more ease. Being the person who is being reviewed is a much different experience from the development leader who is organizing the code review, however here are some things that will help you keep things together and ensure the process of code review is less painful.

One of the most important things to remember is that the code is not you, so don’t take things personally. Remember that development is a creative process and when a reviewer suggests changes to the code they are not casting judgment on you as a person or on your skills as a developer. Instead of taking every piece of feedback as a personal attack use it instead to grow and learn from the process.

You should try to create some sort of checklist for yourself to highlight the things code reviews tend to focus on. This is usually an easy step to implement as it should follow the outline set by the coding standards document. This is your checklist so make sure you focus in on the areas you tend to struggle with, do this then run through the code amending any errors within it, not only will this make you feel better when the team find less faults but it will also make the whole process a lot quicker making everyone happy.

It is really important that you play your part in helping to maintain coding standards. Look to add to the coding standards, especially for things that are not already in there. One of the most fundamental challenges for any developer has when organizing combative code review is understanding or knowing where the next problem will come from. If you incorporate new found problems into your coding standard checklist, it will be ready for use the next time you come up against a code review. It is important to be constantly learning during the code review process, using you checklist will help cement the concept into your so that your less likely so that your less likely to miss opportunities to use and implement feedback.

Code review for any developer can be an arduous process but following the above simple guidelines will increase the capacity you have to get through the process quickly and efficiently

If you would like to know more about Code Review please visit our Software Inspection Site

[tags]code review, software inspection[/tags]




How Do You Select A Web Hosting Company

Thursday 11 June 2009 @ 6:32 pm

It is a common practice observed these days that almost every month people are just going on losing their jobs due to the major downtown or the recession in the economy. As the people are not able to find suitable jobs for themselves they are looking for more and more options of small online businesses.

The most common of all is the online business. There is constant need of the web hosting companies which would help in developing the sites for promoting their products and services online. On an average around 30,000 websites are getting launched almost every day. Therefore, there is a constant need of the web hosting companies to meet up the requirements.

There are a lot of web hosting companies in the market today that help you to meet your requirements of the website development but it is on to you to decide which one suits you the best and is able to provide you with the best of services at all times. Below listed are few of the things that you should consider while searching for the web hosting company:

The most important question is what you should look for while selecting the web hosting company. The first and foremost point to be considered here is to avoid those companies which have the main intent of overselling their plans.

An over seller is a term used for a web host who is able to offer huge amount of bandwidth and server space for a very cheap price. But how can that be possible? The answer is very simple, these companies try packing hundreds of websites onto a single web server, knowing that not all the websites will be able to utilize the bandwidth and the space allocated to them.

Getting your website hosted by an over seller would simply mean that there is every possibility that your website would experience downtime or slow load times because of the number of sites that have been packed onto the server.

The fact is that, majority of the websites do not require large amount of bandwidths or space. In fact, the websites have less than hundred pages and there are less than 500 people who would be visiting any website in a day.

In case that your website is getting more than thousand views in a day, still on an average you would be utilizing around 5 6GB of data transfer every day. If at all you decide to get a website made that is over 1000 pages, it will take a considerable amount of time for the website to get created and in fact more time for the search engines to crawl your website and thereby resulting in a constant traffic for your website.

If you are planning to get started with a new website, you should go in for those special hosting packages that are able to meet your immediate requirements. If you have a small website which is able to get enough traffic, there is every possibility that you will even have to get it upgraded.

It is always advisable to go in for a web hosting company that has a good reputation and has been available online for quite some time now. The biggest advantage of selecting these companies would be that firstly you would not be overcharged, secondly they will be able to solve all your queries and last but not the least your website will not have any downtime. Best of luck in finding the best web hosting company for your website.

Free web hosting sites for advertising, without getting into heavy spending, want to sign up with free promotional sites, banners, texts and many more, grab more information by visiting http://www.suzanastopwebhosts.com.

[tags]web hosting,best web hosts,cheap web hosting,web hosting reviews, free web hosting,dream host[/tags]




Ways On How To Get A Stampede Of Traffic

Thursday 11 June 2009 @ 11:55 am

When you want people to visit your website, you do not want them to just visit. You want them to get hooked to it and with that, you do not want just a handful of people to be hooked. When talking about how to get a stampede of traffic, you are talking about having much more than what you want and all of them hooked to your website. The number of people who visit should be so many that it would be out of control. While this notion may seem too romantic, you can have that if you know what to do.

First, assess your options and what you can do. Ask yourself questions such as what is in a website that would make people visit? What is in a website that would get people to be hooked to it? With those questions at hand, apply it to your situation. What can I do to attract people to my website? Or what can I put in my website to get people hooked to it. While you would think of answers to those, here are some things that you may consider when doing so.

When you are looking for something that you are not too familiar of, what do you usually result to? A search engine of course and if you are to use one to increase traffic to your website, you have to see to it that your website would appear among some of the most visible sites that would pop out if you would type some keywords. Considering this, you have to know that most people who will be visiting your website will not be too familiar with it, especially if it is the first time that they will do so.

Merely having a website that is easy to access and is very visible is already quite enough to have a significant amount of traffic coming in but with that, you should not be contented with just about that. You dont want a light traffic, you want ways on how to get a stampede for that to happen, you would need to put in extra effort. You would be delighted to know that it actually is not that complicated and the approaches to it are actually quite very familiar.

One popular approach is something that we are all into, the social network. Think about it, if internet is a big thing in were you are, how much of all the people you know would at least have an account in any social networking website? A lot indeed, social networking is just so popular that is has become very basic for people to have an account. Considering that and the amount of people who are into it, you can take advantage of it and have a way to have a fraction of all people who have social networking accounts to at least visiting your website.

The internet is a very broad topic, but only a few things in the internet would have people hooked to it. If you just know what to do to get a stampede of traffic in your website, that could just be the next big thing.

Discover the secrets of diverting traffic to your website at http://www.web20traffic4u.com which provides up to date information on Web2.0 Stampede, Stampede of traffic, Search Traffic, Generate Traffic, Targeted Traffic and much more. For more information, logon to http://www.web20traffic4u.com

[tags]Web2.0 Stampede, Stampede of traffic, Traffic, Generate Traffic, Targeted Traffic, SEO, Search Engi[/tags]




Get The Solution To Find The Best West Hosting Services

Monday 8 June 2009 @ 9:34 am

If you are a proud owner of a business and are seriously interested in creating its presence felt on the Internet, then you should certainly consider the option of having your own website. In order to achieve this, you should be able to find the best hosting solution for yourself. When your business is about to start, it is quite imperative that you should be able to find a cheap but quality web hosting solution provider which should be able to give you that extra attention at least for the initial days.

Once you are able to achieve this kind of service, you should be rest assured that all the necessary features associated with your website will certainly be fulfilled and all this in a very low budget. It can also include the ecommerce if you are interested in selling the services or goods online.

Before proceeding with anything, it is extremely important to note down all the things that are required by you in the website. After you have noted down, the next step will be to start hunting for the most appropriate web hosting company that will be able to fulfill all your needs or requirements at a reasonable cost. In fact you will be able to find a great deal of packages over the net which are just perfect for all the small businesses. Whenever you have finalized on certain company, you need to explain your thoughts and ideas on what you want your website to be like. They would come up with the necessary suggestions and feedback after this. Based on your specifications and requirements, they will come up with the quote.

Whenever you look for any hosting provider, it is always advisable that you try settling with some reputed company only. This will ensure that despite of the low price, you are still getting an outstanding package. At times, you might be able to find some low cost packages but they might not be as good as you would want them to be or they might not provide you with the kind of services that you expected. You can get the right company that you want in several ways. One of the most common ways would be to search online. By typing in the right set of keywords, you will get the desired results, and you can further check the profile for each if the company and base your decision accordingly. You should also ensure to go through all the feedbacks and reviews as these will help you to get a fair idea, as to what their existing customers feel about them.

There are certain packages that have only been designed for the small and the medium sized businesses, as others are only meant for fairly big businesses. You simply have to select and decide as to what suits and fits your business requirement the best. It is quite challenging to get into the world of online business. If you are not very clear about the concept of online business and how it functions and how the ecommerce works, then you should certainly consider the option of hiring a web hosting company. They will take the burden and the troubles of establishing your online business for an unbeatable price. With the help of web hosting companies, it will be quite easy to go ahead with the online business.

Free web hosting sites for advertising, without getting into heavy spending, want to sign up with free promotional sites, banners, texts and many more, grab more information by visiting http://www.suzanastopwebhosts.com.

[tags]web hosting,best web hosts,cheap web hosting,web hosting reviews, free web hosting,dream host[/tags]




Code Review - Light Weight Code Review

Thursday 7 May 2009 @ 5:53 am

A Light Weight Code Review needs less visual projection than formal code inspections. If done accurately it can be similarly helpful. Lightweight Code Reviews are often carried out as part of the usual software development process and try to progress the cost profit aspect as long as code quality is good with not incurring costs of the visual projection of traditional meetings based inspections.

Above shoulder review - A developer positioning above the instigators workstation as the person in charge walk the assessor in the course of a set of code changes. Uncomplicated to accomplish these types of reviews provide them to learn and distribute among the developers and gets people to cooperate with each other rather than hiding behind impersonal e-mail and immediate messages. The frailty and ease unfortunately guides to some inadequacy like the procedure not being implemented; not having enough code review procedures metrics; do not work for circulated teams; the reviewer being led too quickly through the code and it does not verify the faults were properly fixed.

Email Pass Around - The person responsible or cause code management system collects the code alterations and forwards an email to the assessors. Comparatively Uncomplicated to accomplish, are the types of reviews that has extra advantages of working evenly with the distributed teams. Some other persons like field specialists can be brought in for reviewing some areas or a reviewer may adjourn to another reviewer. Failing includes the complexity to follow the range of discussion or code changes. Due to lack of code review procedures metrics and the reviewers are not able to confirm that faults were properly fixed.

Tool assisted - specific tools are being used in all portion of review like gathering files, spreading and presenting files, clarification, gathering metrics and controlling code review process workflows. The main problem of the tools support review is the rate of purchasing a commercial presentation or the improvement cost related with increasing an in-house tool.

Pair Programming - two developers writing code at a particular workstation by means of constant free-form negotiations and review like major in great programming. Some of them dispute that the nearness is precisely what they do not need from a reviewer as they need a new, neutral judgment.

In new projects that are coming up over the shoulder methods this is used to review procedures other than having no review, opting for this method is the best and the easiest possibility to equalize the cost factor of the reviews. All submissions in the warehouse need to be reviewed by an associate developer and the particulars added to ensure the essential traceability and visibilities.

If you looking for the most popular code review tool online, please visit , Smart Bear Software Inspection

[tags]code review, software inspection[/tags]




«« Previous Posts